Programme / Course level curriculum design is complex and should not be rushed. Here I will outline my overarching approach to this.

Having supported numerous Course teams through this process in various subject areas over the years, I have consistently drawn upon Biggs’ constructive alignment model which has underpinned my approach to this work and in my experience transcends disciplines.

Based on a three year undergraduate programme my advice to programme teams is to progress in this order:

1: programme aims and learning outcomes developed (informed by subject benchmarks / PSRB / employers etc)

2: final year modules developed (learning outcomes first then assessments & learning activities) – these modules should be informed by and aligned to the programme aims and LOs

3: second year modules developed (learning outcomes first then assessments & learning activities) – these modules should ensure students are prepared well enough to be successful in the final year (thereby informed by and aligned to the final year modules).

4: first year modules developed in the same way, (informed by and align to the second year modules).

5: Induction process/activities developed to ensure incoming students are well prepared and orientated to start their undergraduate study based on first year module expectations.

6: Recruitment processes aligned to ensure appropriate entry criteria developed and students recruited aligned to course expectations.

University College Dublin have an excellent resource explaining Constructive Alignment: http://www.ucdoer.ie/index.php/Using_Biggs’_Model_of_Constructive_Alignment_in_Curriculum_Design/Introduction

No responses yet

Leave a Reply

To respond on your own website, enter the URL of your response which should contain a link to this post's permalink URL. Your response will then appear (possibly after moderation) on this page. Want to update or remove your response? Update or delete your post and re-enter your post's URL again. (Find out more about Webmentions.)